Objectives: To evaluate the proportion of patients on daily hdICS/LABA therapy experiencing exacerbations (1, 2 and ≥3 exacerbations annually), but who have not received a trial of additional add-on therapy.
Methods: Retrospective study using the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) to identify inadequately controlled hdICS/LABA patients (average ICS daily dose of ≥800mcg beclometasone dipropionate equivalent in the prior year and ≥1 LABA prescription in the prior 2 years) and the proportion prescribed appropriate “additional add-on therapy” (namely ≥1 month of: LTRA, or theo, or oral beta2-agonists ever). We used a history of exacerbations (1, 2, ≥3 exacerbations) as evidence of poor control. High risk patients were those with ≥2 exacerbations in the prior year, detected using a composite measure based on the American Thoracic Society / European Respiratory Society exacerbation definition, namely records of: acute oral steroid prescriptions, hospital admissions and Accident & Emergency attendance for asthma.
Results: Of 96,964 asthma patients in the dataset, 21,994 (23%) were prescribed hdICS+LABA. Of these, 17,971 (82%) had never received additional add-on therapy. Although patients experiencing exacerbations were more likely to have been prescribed additional add-on therapy (p<0.001), 15% of those on hdICS/LABA alone had had 2 or more exacerbations in the past year.
Number of exacerbations in prior year |
n |
HDICS+LABA + NO additional add-on |
HDICS+LABA + Additional add-on |
0 exacerbations | 14,375 |
12,257 (85%) | 2,118 (15%) |
1 exacerbation | 3,744 | 2,995 (80%) | 749 (20%) |
2 exacerbations | 1,584 | 1,153 (73%) | 431 (27%) |
≥3 exacerbations | 2,291 | 1,566 (68%) | 725 (32%) |
Conclusions: The low prescribing of additional add-on therapy among hdICS/LABA patients with inadequate control and at high risk of exacerbations (many of whom should be receiving specialist input) suggests limited implementation of asthma guidelines and potential sub-optimal asthma management in UK primary care.