2026 Immunologic Evaluation of the Patients with Cefaclor Hypersensitivity

Saturday, 8 December 2012
Hall 4 (HICC)

Hye-Soo Yoo, MD , Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea

Seung-Hyun Kim, PhD , Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea

Hyouk-Soo Kwon , Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Tae-Bum Kim, MD, PhD , Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Young-Hee Nam, MD , Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea

Mi-Ae Kim , Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea

Young Min Ye, MD , Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea

Hae-Sim Park, MD, PhD , Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University Hospital, South Korea

Background: Cefaclor is the most common cephalosporin to induce anaphylaxis. We evaluated immunologic findings of cefaclor hypersensitivity.

Methods: 36 patients with a history of immediate reactions to cefaclor were enrolled from Ajou University Hospital and Asan Medical Center, South Korea. Those with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to cefaclor were defined by a certain clinical history with or without specific IgE to cefaclor by immunoCAP system. Serum specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG4 levels to cefaclor-HSA conjugate were measured by ELISA, and compared with those of ImmunoCAP system. The binding specificity was evaluated by ELISA inhibition test.

Results: Anaphylaxis(group I, 80.6%) was the most common phenotype, followed by urticaria (group II, 19.4%). There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics, such as age, sex and atopy status between group I and II.  The serum specific IgE to cefaclor by ImmunoCAP was found in total 29 (80.6%) patients , 24 (82.8%) in group I and 5(71.4%) in group II with no significant according to clinical parameters.  The prevalence of serum specific IgE, and IgG1, IgG4 to cefaclor-HSA conjugate by ELISA tended to be higher in group I (51.7%, 53.6%, 20.7%) than in group II(14.3%, 14.3%, 0%), although these differences were not statistically significant. Serum specific IgG4 to cefaclor-HSA conjugate was observed only in group I. 10.3% patients in group I had high specific IgG1 to cefaclor-HSA conjugate with no specific IgE. Significant associations were found between specific IgE and IgG1 or IgG4 antibodies (p <0.001, p =0.004). ELISA inhibition tests showed significant inhibitions by both free cefalcor and cefaclor-HSA conjugate.

Conclusions: Most common manifestation of immediate hypersensitivities to cefaclor was anaphylaxis in which IgE mediate response is the major pathogenic mechanism. Detection of serum specific E and IgG subtypes to cefaclor-HSA conjugate may be useful to diagnose cefaclor anaphylaxis. The IgG subtype- mediated response was suggested in some cases of cefaclor anaphylaxis.