4213 A 26-Week Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Ciclesonide Hydrofluoralkane Nasal Aerosol in Subjects with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

Wednesday, 7 December 2011: 13:45 - 14:00
Costa Maya 1 (Cancún Center)

William Berger, MD, MBA , Allergy & Asthma Associates, Mission Viejo, CA

Dale Mohar, MD , Kerrville Research Associates, Kerrville, TX

Gordon Raphael, MD , Asthma, Allergy & Clinical Research, Bethesda, MD

Craig LaForce, MD , North Carolina Clinical Research, Raleigh, NC

Holly Huang, PhD, MPH , Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Marlborough, MA

Shailesh Desai, PhD , Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Marlborough, MA

Frederick Bode, MD , Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Marlborough, MA

John Karafilidis, PharmD , Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Marlborough, MA

Background: Ciclesonide hydrofluoroalkane nasal aerosol (CIC-HFA) is currently in development as a potential treatment for allergic rhinitis. The objective of this study was to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of CIC-HFA compared to placebo in subjects with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).

Methods: Subjects ≥12 years of age with a ≥2 year history of PAR were randomized in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, multicenter study to CIC-HFA 74µg (N=298), CIC-HFA 148µg (N=505), or placebo (N=307) QD AM for 26 weeks. Subject-reported change from baseline in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) and instantaneous total nasal symptom score (iTNSS) averaged every 2 weeks over the 26 weeks of the treatment period were secondary endpoints and were calculated as a sum of the individual nasal symptoms of congestion, runny nose, sneezing, and nasal itching. Change from baseline in the individual reflective and instantaneous nasal symptom scores averaged every 2 weeks over the 26 weeks of treatment period were also evaluated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed throughout the study.

Results: CIC-HFA 74µg and CIC-HFA 148µg doses demonstrated improvement in rTNSS (LS mean change 0.65 & 0.52 respectively, P≤0.01 for both), iTNSS (LS mean change 0.51 & 0.42 respectively, P≤0.05 for both), and improvements in the individual reflective and instantaneous nasal symptoms (P≤0.05 for all except instantaneous sneezing for the CIC-HFA 74μg dose) at 26 weeks from baseline. P-values were unadjusted for multiplicity. The overall incidence of TEAEs was comparable between the CIC-HFA treatment groups and placebo. The most frequently reported TEAEs (≥5% of subjects in any treatment group) were headache, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, viral upper respiratory tract infections, sinusitis, and epistaxis.

Conclusions: In this study, once-daily treatment with CIC-HFA 74µg or CIC-HFA 148µg demonstrated improvements in the nasal symptoms of PAR. Both active treatments were well tolerated.