4159 The Risk of Atopic Dermatitis in Children Exposed to Pets During Pregnancy

Wednesday, 7 December 2011: 12:45 - 13:00
Gran Cancún 1 (Cancún Center)

Neetu Vasu, MD , Allergy Immunology, Henry Ford Health System, Birmingham, MI

Ganesa Wegienka, Ph.D. , Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital & Health System, Detroit, MI

Suzanne Havstad, MA , Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Hospital & Health System, Detroit, MI

Christine Cole Johnson , Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI

Edward Zoratti, M.D. , Allergy and Immunology, Henry Ford Hospital & Health System, Detroit, MI

Background: Although the mechanism is uncertain, some studies have linked prenatal and early-life pet exposure to a decreased risk of atopic dermatitis (AD).

Methods: 675 participants in a southeast Michigan population-based birth cohort were evaluated at age 2-4 years. Based on medical history and examination, a study physician was asked to determine whether there was evidence of current AD or a past history consistent with AD.  Information regarding the presence of indoor dogs or cats was prospectively collected from the participants’ mothers during pregnancy.

Results:

     Of 675 maternal-child pairs, 255 (37.7%) mothers reported living with a pet during pregnancy and 150 children (22%) were diagnosed with either current or prior atopic dermatitis by age 2-4 years. Compared to mothers not exposed to indoor pets during pregnancy, the risk of AD was lower among offspring of 255 mothers that lived with an indoor pet prenatally [OR=0.6, 95% CI (0.4, 0.9), p=0.01].  The lower risk was seen primarily among 137 mothers reporting indoor dogs only [OR=0.5, (0.3, 0.8),  p=0.009]  or 43  that had lived with both indoor cat(s) and dog(s) [OR=0.4 (0.1, 1.0), p=0.05]. There did not appear to be a similar effect among 75 mothers with cat only prenatal exposure [OR=0.9 (0.5, 1.6), p=0.79]. When analyses were restricted to the presence or absence of dog exposure (not considering cat co-exposure), offspring were also less likely to have had current or prior AD [OR 0.5(0.3, 0.8), p=0.002].

     Results of analyses further restricted to dog exposure and “current AD” (AD present at the 2-4 year evaluation) were similar [OR 0.5 (0.3, 0.9), p=0.013]. These results were not substantially different in logistic regression models adjusting for the child’s total IgE level or the presence of atopy as assessed by positive allergen-specific IgE tests or positive skin prick tests to a panel of common allergens.

Conclusions: Prenatal dog exposure is associated with a lower risk of AD in young children.  The mechanism(s) responsible for this relationship require further study.