3184 Open-Label Use of Nanofiltered C1 Esterase Inhibitor (Human) (C1 INH-nf) for the Prophylaxis of Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Attacks

Tuesday, 6 December 2011: 13:30 - 13:45
Gran Cancún 5 (Cancún Center)

Bruce Zuraw , Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

James Baker , Allergy Asthma & Dermatology Assoc., Lake Oswego, OR

David Hurewitz , Allergy Clinic of Tulsa, Inc., Tulsa, OK

Martha White , Institute for Asthma and Allergy, Wheaton, MD

Arthur Vegh , Puget Sound Allergy Asthma and Imm., Tacoma, WA

Leonard Bielory , University of Medicine and Dentistry NJ, Newark, NJ

William Lumry , Allergy and Asthma Specialists, Dallas, TX

Marc Riedl , Clinical Immunology and Allergy, UCLA - David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

Mark Davis-Lorton , Winthrop - University Hospital, Mineola, NY

Robyn Levy , Family Allergy and Asthma Center, PC, Atlanta, GA

John Andrew Grant , University Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

Paula Busse , Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

Aleena Banerji , Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Huamin Henry Li , Institute for Asthma & Allergy, Chevy Chase, MD

Ira Kalfus , M2G Consulting , New York, NY

Colin Broom , ViroPharma Incorporated, Exton, PA

David Mariano , ViroPharma Incorporated, Exton, PA

Background: HAE is a genetic disease characterized by recurrent, painful and potentially life-threatening swelling episodes. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of C1 INH-nf for routine prophylaxis of HAE attacks.

Methods: This open-label, multicenter study (47 sites) enrolled 146 subjects aged ≥1 year with HAE and ≥1 attack per month or history of laryngeal edema. C1 INH-nf was administered prophylactically at 1000U IV every 3 to 7 days. Subjects were also eligible to receive treatment with C1 INH-nf for acute attacks. Subjects documented all attacks on a daily basis. Safety was monitored through the recording of AEs, vital signs, virology and anti-C1 INH antibody assessments.

Results: Mean age was 37 years (range 3-82). Pre-enrollment, subjects had a median HAE attack rate of 3.0 per month (range: 0.08-28.0). On C1 INH-nf prophylaxis, the median number of HAE attacks per month was 0.2 (range: 0-4.6) and 86% experienced an average of ≤1 attack per month; 35% reported no attacks during the study. Exposure to C1 INH-nf varied (range: 8 to 959 days), 73% received C1 INH-nf over a period of at least 6 months. For subjects receiving therapy for at least one year, the median attack rate was consistently low at 0.3 per month (range 0-4.0). Irrespective of age, C1 INH antigenic and functional levels persistently increased following C1 INH-nf therapy. Of 74 subjects tested, no anti-C1 INH antibodies were detectable following C1 INH administration. AEs most frequently reported related to C1 INH-nf were: headache 5.5%, nausea 4.1%, rash 2.7%, erythema 2.1% and diarrhea 2.1%. The most commonly reported SAE was HAE attack (11.6%). Five subjects experienced thrombotic SAEs: MI, DVT, PE, and 2 CVA; none of these was considered to be related to C1 INH-nf. There were no severe hypersensitivity reactions related to C1 INH-nf. There was no evidence of transmission of HBV, HCV, or HIV during this study.

Conclusions: C1 INH-nf prophylaxis reduced the median monthly HAE attack rate and showed persistent effects per subject who received prophylaxis over a 1-year period. These data support the safety and efficacy of C1 INH-nf for routine prophylaxis of HAE attacks.